T.M. wrote:...ask Sektor to delete this topic and we can all live happily ever after.
I think we might be on the same page for once
Seriously though, this
is getting a bit out of hand. Some interesting bits here and there in this topic but it's knee deep with the rest in crap!
BenMillard wrote:If "fair credit" also includes providing a link, that adds a decade-long maintenance worry on top of the initial admin.
Keeping track of links for the creators is pretty pointless. Besides, any people making maps and stuff will either come to GTA Forums or here at GTAMP to post it unless it's some
really obscure map that people distribute between themselves. Again, this comes back to having too much credit, see my
previous post on what/how I credit.
Seriously, we do this for
fun and doesn't need to be a chore to ensure that a readme/credits have links that work correctly linking to files or programs used until the end of time. Nowadays a quick Google search will usually pick stuff like this up anyway for those who want more information. An example
like this is fine.
BenMillard wrote:So the question is: how thorough/relaxed can credit be and still be considered fair? Fair for the people who want/deserve credit and fair for those who have to to do all the boring admin.
Credits should just be that - short,to the point and relevant, and not a freakin' disseration

If someone asks to be included then I don't see why not, and in this case and topic (pretty much most of this topic actually) just add TM to credits and be done with it so we can prevent World War III breaking out! Significant testers or programs are good to mention, but one game only play testers can just be categorised as "General Testers" or something.
Dismissed!